Cognitive bias
Version vom 22. November 2022, 16:26 Uhr von Timborg (Diskussion | Beiträge) (→Cognitive bias codex)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_bias
Cognitive bias codex
- Beeindruckendes SVG Modell
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Cognitive_bias_codex_en.svg&lang=en
- https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/65/Cognitive_bias_codex_en.svg
- Too Much Information
- We notice things already primed in memory or repeated often
- Availability heuristic
- Attentional bias
- Illusory truth effect
- Mere–exposure effect
- Context effect
- Cue–dependent forgetting
- Mood–congruent memory bias
- Frequency illusion
- Baader–Meinhof Phenomenon
- Empathy gap
- Omission bias
- Base rate fallacy
- Bizarre, funny, visually striking, or anthropomorphic things stick out more than non-bizarre/unfunny things
- Bizarreness effect
- Humor effect
- Von Restorff effect
- Picture superiority effect
- Self–relevance effect
- Negativity bias
- We notice when something has changed
- Anchoring
- Conservatism
- Contrast effect
- Distinction bias
- Focusing effect
- Framing effect
- Money illusion
- Weber–Fechner law
- We are drawn to details that confirm our own existing beliefs
- Confirmation bias
- Congruence bias
- Post–purchase rationalization
- Choice–supportive bias
- Selective perception
- Observer–expectancy effect
- Experimenter's bias
- Observer effect
- Expectation bias
- Ostrich effect
- Subjective validation
- Continued influence effect
- Semmelweis reflex
- We notice flaws in others more easily than we notice flaws in ourselves
- Bias blind spot
- Naïve cynicism
- Naïve realism
- We notice things already primed in memory or repeated often
- Not Enough Meaning
- We tend to find stories and patterns even when looking at sparse data
- Confabulation
- Clustering illusion
- Insensitivity to sample size
- Neglect of probability
- Anecdotal fallacy
- Illusion of validity
- Masked–man fallacy
- Recency illusion
- Gambler's fallacy
- Hot–hand fallacy
- Illusory correlation
- Pareidolia
- Anthropomorphism
- We fill in characteristics from stereotypes, generalities, and prior histories
- Group attribution error
- Ultimate attribution error
- Stereotyping
- Essentialism
- Functional fixedness
- Moral credential effect
- Just–world hypothesis
- Argument from fallacy
- Authority bias
- Automation bias
- Bandwagon effect
- Placebo effect
- We imagine things and people we're familiar with or fond of as better
- Out–group homogeneity bias
- Cross–race effect
- In–group favoritism
- Halo effect
- Cheerleader effect
- Positivity effect
- Not invented here
- Reactive devaluation
- Well–traveled road effect
- We simplify probabilities and numbers to make them easier to think about
- Mental accounting
- Appeal to probability fallacy
- Normalcy bias
- Murphy's Law
- Zero sum bias
- Survivorship bias
- Subadditivity effect
- Denomination effect
- The magical number 7 ± 2
- We think we know what other people are thinking
- Illusion of transparency
- Curse of knowledge
- Spotlight effect
- Extrinsic incentive error
- Illusion of external agency
- Illusion of asymmetric insight
- We project our current mindset and assumptions onto the past and future
- Telescoping effect
- Rosy retrospection
- Hindsight bias
- Outcome bias
- Moral luck
- Declinism
- Impact bias
- Pessimism bias
- Planning fallacy
- Time–saving bias
- Pro–innovation bias
- Projection bias
- Restraint bias
- Self–consistency bias
- We tend to find stories and patterns even when looking at sparse data
- Need To Act Fast
- To act, we must be confident we can make an impact and feel what we do is important
- Overconfidence effect
- Social desirability bias
- Third–person effect
- False consensus effect
- Hard–easy effect
- Lake Wobegone effect
- Dunning–Kruger effect
- Egocentric bias
- Optimism bias
- Forer effect
- Barnum effect
- Self–serving bias
- Actor–observer bias
- Illusion of control
- Illusory superiority
- Fundamental attribution error
- Defensive attribution hypothesis
- Trait ascription bias
- Effort justification
- Risk compensation
- Peltzman effect
- To stay focused, we favor the immediate, relatable thing in front of us
- Hyperbolic discounting
- Appeal to novelty
- Identifiable victim effect
- To get things done, we tend to complete things we've invested time and energy in
- Sunk cost fallacy
- Irrational escalation
- Escalation of commitment
- Generation effect
- Loss aversion
- IKEA effect
- Unit bias
- Zero–risk bias
- Disposition effect
- Pseudocertainty effect
- Processing difficulty effect
- Endowment effect
- Backfire effect
- To avoid mistakes, we aim to preserve autonomy and group status, and avoid irreversible decisions
- System justification
- Reverse psychology
- Reactance
- Decoy effect
- Social comparison effect
- Status quo bias
- We favor simple–looking options and complete information over complex, ambiguous options
- Ambiguity bias
- Information bias
- Belief bias
- Rhyme–as–reason effect
- Bike–shedding effect
- Law of Triviality
- Conjunction fallacy
- Occam's razor
- Less–is–better effect
- To act, we must be confident we can make an impact and feel what we do is important
- What Should We Remember?
- We edit and reinforce some memories after the fact
- Misattribution of memory
- Source confusion
- Cryptomnesia
- False memory
- Suggestibility
- Spacing effect
- We discard specifics to form generalities
- Implicit association
- Implicit stereotypes
- Stereotypical bias
- Prejudice
- Negativity bias
- Fading affect bias
- We reduce events and lists to their key elements
- Peak–end rule
- Leveling and sharpening
- Misinformation effect
- Serial recall effect
- List–length effect
- Duration neglect
- Modality effect
- Memory inhibition
- Primacy effect
- Recency effect
- Part–set cueing effect
- Serial–position effect
- Suffix effect
- We store memories differently based on how they were experienced
- Levels–of–processing effect
- Absent–mindedness
- Testing effect
- Next–in–line effect
- Google effect
- Tip of the tongue phenomenon
- We edit and reinforce some memories after the fact